Dear Regulators,

Comments:I am fully capable of making my own decisions with my own money.

I think a simple consent form acknowledging possibilities for loss should be enough to allow investing in leveraged and inverse etfs by any investor.

I appose this.

I have the capability of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks, and do not need such regulatory measures imposed.

I don't support this idea. I have the right to decide which kind of securities I want to invest in. Leveraged securities are part of a specific investing strategy that I am testing in a smaller part of my portfolio.

Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my
investment strategies. Its hard to focus on one stock and its always better to buy leveraged ETF and minimize risk .Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

Re proposed rule S7-24-15, please don't restrict my right to choose which investments I feel are right for me and my family. I should choose, not be restricted by government fiat. And why can't an average investor access the same stuff as rich people?

Hello, I am writing to voice my objection to proposed legislation which seeks to restrict our right to invest in inverse and leveraged funds.
These types of investments are a very important part of our investment strategy and help in reducing overall portfolio risk, when used appropriately, like most other investment classes, including options.

Leveraged and inverse funds should be made available to all investors not just the rich. Please keep public securities public.