I oppose this proposed regulation because it is over reaching, limiting investors ability, is over reacting to a very small minority of people and does not reflect the vast majority of investors. If the mandate is to protect the public, then require wording and risks for leveraged or inverse funds. There is a place for inverse funds, particularly when markets are declining. and investors should have the ability and choice to be hedge their funds.

Hello, Surely there are more direct ways to protect citizens that are not competent to invest their own money than interfering with normal activities of average investors. Leveraged and inverse funds are regulated public securities that are easier to understand than the average computer screen used by investors. They are a part of my everyday investment tactics and do not need any further restrictions.

Stop with your new world order crap. I'll need to invest in inverse funds to maintain and grow my assets when you guys decide to crash the stock market with your higher Fed funds rates, supply disruptions, etc.

Please, go ahead, ban what you want. That is EXACLY what people like me are hoping for and actually waiting for. The more you try to crack down on ANY fund, investment vehicle, etc., the more DECENTRALIZED this world WILL become. Do you have any clue what this means? This means your silly little power hungry organization that wants so desperately to hang on to the old system, will be crying when you are literally powerless to stop the avalanche of DECENTRALIZED systems that will be coming that you will NOT be able to stop. You cannot stop DECENTRALIZED. So by all means, be my guest.

I can regulate my own investment. Don't need government regulation that hinder my ability to invest in what I believe is attractive.

I should be able to make my own decisions about what I want to invest in, especially leveraged funds. I cant short items or use options, so leveraged funds allow me to make returns in down markets.

How dare you tell me what I can invest in! I have many years of experience, and I make my own decisions. It is not up to you to tell me what is an approximate investment for my account!

To FINRA Regulators,

I oppose restrictions to my right to invest.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies, especially during periods like right now where the stock market is going down most of the time or theres much turmoil. I understand that leveraged and inverse funds and their risks but I have been trading them for months. Everything is fine.
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me, NOT regulators.
Thank you.

I do not want to be restricted in choice of investment by government regulations. I want to remain able to buy leveraged funds.

I'm a retail type investor that very much like to use leveraged ETFs as part of my investing strategy. I strongly oppose any restrictions on leveraged ETFs for retail investors. I understand it is 100% my responsibility to understand the risk associated with any investment. I understand there is potential for losses if I invest in leveraged ETFs. I very much like having maximum flexibility in the choices I can make for my investment portfolio.