| FINRA.org Skip to main content

George Davison Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I disagree with the FINRA Regulatory Notice #22-08. Leveraged and inverse funds are important financial assets to allow individual investor to increase their gains and protect their assets. Please treat us as adults who are responsible for our own decisions and not children who need to be looked over. Therefore, there is no need of a test to determine if we're allowed to invest in these type of funds.

Edward Phillips Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

A leveraged ETF is the simplest security to understand. Investors of all levels of understanding need to be protected from paying loads, commissions, delays in redemptions, and from every money manager who does not understand the Sharpe and Sortino ratios, how to calculate CAGR and report theirs, deviations from random, optimization, value-at-risk, and how to use Monte Carlo simulation. The word "fiduciary" does not protect investors from ignorant investment managers.

Betty Nguyen Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am opposed to regulation #22-08.

I should be able to make my own decisions about my investments, not regulators. I can read & understand the notices that are provided when I choose an investment and should not be required to take a test to prove it.

I use inverse funds as well as other instruments and it will be detrimental to my portfolio if I am unable to use them.

I ask that regulation #22-08 not be enacted.

Robert Caylor Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

I have invested in leveraged and inverse funds for years, and am fully capable of understanding these funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.

The proposed restrictions on my right to invest should not be put in place.