| FINRA.org Skip to main content

Benjamin Fehling Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

Shorting as a market practice is a ridiculous concept to begin with because in no other area of a capitalist market can you borrow something that is already owned and then sell it, only to buy it back at a lower price to intentionally profit off of the initial lender. That aside, self reporting clearly isn’t working, and the ability for borrowed stock to be mis-marked, intentionally or otherwise, is a long standing pervasive issue. Shares need a better marking system to denote “Borrowed” and “Sold while borrowed (shorted)” and a running tally until returned to the original lender.

Anonymous-DL Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

We can start with better transparency. The simple fact is that there are systemic issues with the creation of shares to borrow based on future volumes, failures to deliver, and shorting in general. While appreciated, and needed, the solutions to these do not lie in the resolution of transparency alone. Removing the capability to generate future transactions to borrow from, use for offsetting failed to deliver positions, and in general affecting the stock price negatively needs to be resolved.

Anonymous-JN Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

1. Buy orders vs sell orders buy orders show more inflow and the price drops. 2. Naked shorting, synthetic shares. With amc the CEO gave good information about share holders and the amount per stock holder on average. This number does not add up with the volume of buy and sell orders. 3. It's a simple supply demand the supply is small and demand high. How can the price constantly dropping if no one is selling.