| FINRA.org Skip to main content

Jason Beverly Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

There is no viable reason to restrict access to inverse or leveraged funds from the public. Having been investing my own retirement funds for 20 years I well understand the risks involved. They are an appropriate part of a well balanced portfolio. Hedging and being able to take some advantage of downtrends must not be restricted to professionals and the super wealthy. Anyone with the willingness to understand markets should be able to participate it any investment they wish. Free markets. That is the goal, no?

Jeff Bailey Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To Whom It May Concern: I am a self-directed individual investor writing to urge you in the strongest possible terms to avoid creating any new regulatory barriers to investing in leveraged or inverse funds. Your role in upholding basic investor protections is vital to the integrity of the market. While institutional investors can access a variety of financial instruments to take advantage of market volatility, individual investors have relatively few options other than inverse (or leveraged) exchange traded funds (ETFs). For example, some leveraged/inverse US Treasury ETFs (ex.

Christopher Marquart Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Myself and my partner should be able to choose the public investments that are right for ourselves and our family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. We both enjoy the complexities of the stock market and the option to invest in what we see fit. Please do not limit those of us who have fought for this country (I am a Veteran) and too often do I see the rich elite getting treated with favoritism while the rest of us have to scrape by. There is no reason for anything to change right now and I hope you hear all of our voices and concerns.