| FINRA.org Skip to main content

Bruce Mounsey Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I take extreme exception to your proposal to limit my access to buying any particular class of public funds. This is part of my investment strategy; I employ it as a hedge in my portfolio. It does not require special training or skills to understand the potential risks and benefits of using leveraged and inverse funds. It seems more likely to me that this is just another ploy of the privileged to manipulate and control the free market system, thus preventing people like me from protecting our investments and possibly capitalizing on volatile trends in the economy.

Kimberly Frigon Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have been investing in ETF's for the past 20 years, and I have made significant profits toward my retirement from these particular funds. Removing the ability for the retail investor to hold and trade these funds would severely unduly limit the average investor from profiting the same as the establishment and professional traders, which would be discriminatory and and unfair. We are not stupid and we do not need big brother fed with its oafish hands muddling around in our pockets and affecting our ability to make money & retire well.

Janakk Sanghavi Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose Restrictions to my "Right To Invest".
1. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me & my family. Not only privileged but every citizen have right to Public Investments.
2. Leveraged and inverse funds are very important to my investments as they help protect(hedge) my investments as well as seek better returns when used as a limited part of my investments.